Looking at some local restaurant wine lists online, I couldn’t help noticing this range of prices
for Veuve Clicquot Yellow Label Brut, the non-vintage French champagne that’s one of the most highly visible and relentlessly marketed brands in the world.
Ready?
Umai ……………….. $70
Encore ………………$80
Felicia Suzanne’s …..$85
The Grove Grill ……..$95
Erling Jensen ……….$96
River Oaks ………….$98
Chez Philippe ……… $99
Interim ……………..$112
The Majestic ………$113
Circa ……………….$130
That’s right, readers, there’s a difference of $60 between the lowest and the highest prices of Veuve Clicquot Yellow Label on these 10 wine lists, this for a champagne that retails usually for $35 to $45. Of course the restaurants don’t pay the retail price; they pay wholesale. Yes, I know, the price in the restaurant includes the high Tennessee sales tax on wine as well as the city tax, but still, if Umai, a small establishment that can’t move a lot of the stuff, can charge $70, it means that places charging over, say, $90 are making a killing. And $130!!!!! Does the word “unconscionable” mean anything to you? You pays yer money and you takes yer choice.
Responses to “What Is Expensive II: Consider Veuve Clicquot Yellow Label”
November 30th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
Frederic,
What is inexpensive?
On the issue of wine pricing in restaurants, I think there are some other factors that are important to consider.
I cannot argue with the facts shown; we sell Veuve Cliquot Yellow Label for what we sell it for. However, how any restaurant sets its prices is based on a number of factors. Product Cost, Customer Demand, Availability, Incentives, Seasonality, Carrying Cost, Overhead, and many others. A restaurant doesn’t always price items on a simple “cost plus” model. Veuve Cliquot has taken a price increase of over 30% over the last few years because of the euro exchange rate and customer demand. As a new restaurant, we have priced it based on our current cost and other considerations. It would be safe enough to assume that some restaurants have made a decision to “feature” that champagne and get special pricing, or have simply not updated their menu prices for the cost increases they have taken. It may be a great strategy to sell Veuve Cliquot for $70 if one really wants to move it.
However, it is inaccurate to infer that a restaurant has an “expensive” wine list based on a cost comparison of a single item. At Circa for example, I sell a Pinot Noir, Vision Cellars, by the bottle for $64 and by the glass for $16 - that may seem pricy I admit, but it is a heck of a bargain. Pinot Noir is popular, the customers like choices, and want high-end choices by the glass, and Vision Cellars is a wonderful wine. Therefore, I made a decision to undercut the standard markup and offer something special for a more affordable price. Were we to only sell that by the bottle, it would be closer to $100, and would be well within the normal range for that wine. Your article does make one point however, that there is a significant range of pricing strategies in the market.
Next, the taxes. Liquor by the drink tax is 15% and is in addition to the 9.25% sales tax that we all know and love. Those taxes are included in the retail price - so when you buy a bottle of wine in a restaurant for $60, the first $11.71 is tax, and the net sale to the restaurant is actually only $48.29. And that, in my opinion, is the primary reason for “sticker shock” on wine lists.
Lastly, speaking of inexpensive - we offer wine flights of featured items on Wednesdays for only $8, and for the month of December I will make Veuve Cliquot one of the selections. We are always reviewing the list and consulting with our suppliers and customers to identify and source the best products and offer them at fair prices.
Thanks again for thinking of us and Happy Holidays!!
Sincerely,
John Bragg
Chef/Owner
Circa
P.S. for CarolH - our then sommellier decided that $130 was a totally reasonable price for V.C.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:28 pm
Where are you shopping? Veuve Clicquot retails for $57.99 at Joe’s, Kimbrough & Great Wines. Clicquot has become a commodity, a brand that everyone knows. It is not even that good of a Champagne (obviously my opinion). It is the restaurant’s choice to price it how they wish, just as it is the consumer’s choice not to purchase it.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:55 pm
I agree with Michael. Who’s to say what is an obscene price. Don’t want to pay it , don’t. If you’re in the market for a glass or bottle of Veuve Cliquot, you’re not in great material need in the first place.
What about Starbucks and other similar places. Now those prices are obscene–especially considering the countries and impoverished people who produce the coffee we drink.
Everyone is an expert when it comes to restaurants, economics and education.
Go figure.
November 30th, 2007 at 9:43 pm
I’m afraid John Bragg’s argument doesn’t make any sort of sense to me. You’re suggesting that every other restaurant in town is taking a loss or getting special pricing?
Assuming that the restaurant pays the retail price (which doesn’t make sense) and that the $57.99 quote is more representative of the current retail price, and that there’s the taxes on a $130 bottle add up to $31.53, there’s still a forty dollar markup, basically two-thirds of the retail price.
The long list of factors which influence pricing really don’t seem to apply here either. How is seasonality a factor in the pricing of champagne?
December 1st, 2007 at 12:31 am
Allie,seasonality may or may not affect the price of champagne, BUT, like food prices, seasonality does affect the price of beef and caviar during the holidays.
December 1st, 2007 at 4:23 am
I Don’t know if you do agree but the cost is different and changes are made. Do me a favor buy barrel of oil and compare the price of gas or maybe the mark up of produce. If you are dinning at a restaurant, these prices are going to affect the above. This is why prices are higher and
they are also because people are not supporting the people, community, and enviroment arond them.
December 1st, 2007 at 9:23 am
So… all these extra costs only happen at Circa, and not at any other restaurants?
December 1st, 2007 at 12:17 pm
Allie, I mentioned in my post that restaurants do not pay the retail price for wine, they pay wholesale. And while, as John Bragg points out, many factors enter into the price shown for a wine or champagne on a wine list, the fact remains that the wholesale price for Veuve Clicquot Yellow Label in Memphis is $34. Every restaurant starts from that point, adds the appropriate taxes (which in Tennessee are steep) and goes on from there to charge what they think is the right price for their restaurants. The fact that, as can be seen in my post, a $60 difference separates the unusually generous price at Umai from the price at Circa, which is almost four times wholesale, represents what I think is an almost ludicrous spread. Sure, as James says, who’s to say what an obscene price is? Restaurants are free to set whatever price they want to on anything they sell. But must every business be run on the principle of “let the buyer beware”?
Michael, I was quoted national average prices for VCYL found on the Internet. Prices for wine and champagne locally do tend to be higher than the national averages. I apoligize for not making that clear.
And I know that I’m curious to find out, and others probably are too, now that Randy has left Circa, who will be managing the restaurant and its innovative wine list. Perhaps John Bragg will come back and tell us.
December 1st, 2007 at 12:52 pm
What a ludicrous post. Quibbling about the price of Veuve Cliquot.
Must be nice to have time to worry about the price of champagne when gas is well over $3 a gallon, foreclosures are on the rise and the country is in an endless war with over 3000 young Americans dead and no champagne toasts in sight.
Marie Antoinette would be proud.
December 1st, 2007 at 2:05 pm
JB, buddy they have been beating you up to long on here so let me try to help you out. I broker wine deals everyday. Price and season does matter. Here is a little secret, like everything else not everybody pays the same. Even wholesale! Wine buying, is like politics, just the same as most industries in the United States. We will not see a case break on high end champagne until March.
Umai is making less than $12 per bottle. That means they are better off selling beer,but here are some factors to think about.
Umai is on Madison in an older building next to Quick Check. He gets some street traffic and not much. The household income is average at best. Ken is using the pricing of his wines as a tool to drive people in to try his food. He believes in his product and i am sure he feels if he get get them in once, he will build a loyal base. Now I do not know what his overhead is but in that structure, it is lets say average. His place is somewhere you can have a nice dinner several time a week without filing bankruptcy, but I would not take my pops the for his 60th birthday.
Remember this word OVERHEAD!
Now JB went downtown. In my opinion he built out one of the best looking places Memphis has seen. Again I do not know what his lease is but I am glad I dont have to pay it! When you sip your champagne at circa, you watch the trolly go by. People lounge at the bar, The music plays softly, You getthe picture. Ummm Is the settings different, very. Would you eat at Circa 4 time a week probaly not, unless you make six figs. Would I get my redneck dad off the couch and let him drink Bud from the bottle on his 60th birthday at circa. Yes. You see Jb uses a ton of things Ken does not. The types of table cloths, dinner napkins, the amount of labor………..i can go on and on.
Now lets talk buying power. I went to Houstons to meet a friend who thinks that place is great. He is an idiot but hey I love him anyway. I look at the list and see Etude pinot noir for $59 per bottle!!!!! I dont know how they do it but I am pretty sure it has something to do with the amount of wine they purchase as a chain. It must be on there core list. Put it this way I tink I pay $33 and some change for it. So sometime larger companies can out buy us small folks.
People are different. Fred said he thought French Laundry was worth it. I though it was very good……..I would not go back. I spent the same money at Alenia and can not wait to go back. People say we are expensive. I believe we put out a great experiance. Is it for everybody no. Is it for my loyal base that keeps my doors open and wholesalers at my door for our business. Yes
My loyals know that I run a nightly wine bargain. the servers do not tell you. Once you come in for a while you figure it out. Last night we sold Opus One 2004 for $200 a bottle. Is that expensive?
Setting, company, decor, service, we pay for all of these thing. You get what you pay for. And if it is expensive to you, you do not have to buy it.
JB, I am sure you do not need any help with the wine list, but if you every want to drink a couple bottles and talk about it let me know.
Chris Henderson
GM Equestria
December 1st, 2007 at 2:17 pm
I should have proof read that comment, so many errors. Thats why I sell wine!
December 2nd, 2007 at 9:17 pm
I agree with Michael. Seems like you have been beating up on certain downtown restaurants and Circa and Bragg in particular and with pointed regularity–Encore and Majestic, too.
What’s the story? I was trying to think what they all have in common. Same landlord? At least some or all chef ownership? Local entrepreneurs attempting to make a buck? Passionate about work and cooking? Are they all jerks in your opinion? Trying to provide high end experiences? Personal reasons that we will never be privy to? They’ve thrown you outta the places? Inquiring minds want to know!
December 3rd, 2007 at 12:13 am
Pete, I’m going to take a stand for Fredric here on Circa. A few months ago he reviewed the restaurant and I believe everyone expected it (the review) to be better than it was. He knew that was the case and therefore wrote about it on the blog, offering a more in-depth explanation than the printed review allowed. The post inspired many responses, some in agreement with him and others defending the Circa and John Bragg–it got a bit heated. So I’m guessing this is what you’re talking about when you say we’ve been beating up on Circa, but I have no idea what you’re talking about regarding Encore or Majestic. I can’t think of a negative word either of us has said about them (Fredric, correct me if I’m wrong).
John, kudos on the Wednesday night wine flights in general (I wish more restaurants offered them) and in particular for making Veuve Clicquot available in December.
December 3rd, 2007 at 12:29 am
Me think the lady doth protest too much.
I believe that Koeppel referred to Encore in a recent blog as being sadly indifferent and also lamented somewhere that too bad downtown restaurants are all the same. He seems to have it in for Spindini,too.
Maybe the new and hip are too much for you guys? is it a generational thing?
Several snide references have been made about Circa on various Koeppel blogs.
And I meant to write earlier that I agree with Mr. Henderson who also received an unfair review, being called inconsistent after only two visits.
Or do these heated blogs generate more hits for you guys. Shock jocks do it. Maybe it’s the same for blogs and critics.
December 3rd, 2007 at 2:00 pm
James: I’ve never doubted that Chris Henderson is a gentleman. I know that he manages Equestria with style and grace, and he provided some important insights to this post about restaurant wines lists and the factors that go into pricing.
Pete: Say what? I mentioned once in a response to a post last week that our last meal at Encore wasn’t very good (”sadly indifferent”). That’s hardly “beating up” the place “with pointed regularity.” Same for The Majestic. I reviewed the place and gave it a mainly positive two stars in June 2006; other than that, I’ve never mentioned the restaurant. Again, that’s hardly “beating up” the place “with pointed regularity.” Giving Spinidini two stars and a half stars isn’t “having it in” for the restaurant; that’s a star rating many restaurants would love to earn. The Equestria review was far from “unfair.” Restaurant reviewers are allowed by The CA to go to a restaurant twice at company expense; at Equestria we had mostly excellent fare and then two dishes that simply didn’t make sense, either in conception or execution. Coming from the same chef and kitchen, that constitutes inconsistency.
Frankly, I don’t care if a restaurant is hip and groovy or staid and sedate. What I want is thoughtful and well-prepared food coupled with thoughtful and efficient service in whatever the physical setting or context, whether it’s a corner grocery store or a white-table restaurant, and I want all of this accomplished with consistencey and lack of pretension in the ideas, in the effort and in the prices, and that means the prices for the food and the wine. I believe that consumers expect the same qualities in restaurants.
As far as Circa is concerned, I’m on record as admiring the wine program there and its approach to selling wine. I hope that the program will continue in the absence of the person who created it, and it sounds, from what John said, that it will. There are, as John and Chris pointed out above, MANY factors that go into the pricing of a wine list, and as John mentioned to me in a telephone message this weekend, a wine list needs to be examined completely for a full evaluation; obviously other wines on the Circa list are priced at attractive levels. But the point of this post was not to assess the full wine lists of the restaurants mentioned; it was to point out for consumers the huge difference between the low price and the high price for one popular item, the Veuve Clicquot Yellow Label Brut. It’s telling to me that Felicia Suzanne’s, also on Main Street, also on the trolley line, also in a large space in a restored historic building, manages to sell VCYL for $85; is rent so much cheaper north of Union? The point, then, of this post is that diners — who are often spending wads of dough on dinner in restaurants that need to build a base of returning patrons –need to know these factors in order to make informed decisions.
December 3rd, 2007 at 6:35 pm
James,
“What about Starbucks and other similar places. Now those prices are obscene–especially considering the countries and impoverished people who produce the coffee we drink.”
At least in Starbucks’ case, it needs to be understood that Starbucks not only pays more that the market price for beans, but they also tend to invest in the communities of their growers. Starbucks has been responsible for the building of medical clinics and day care centers on coffee plantations for the workers to ensure they are getting care they need. They give those communities financial incentives to improve the lives of the workers.
In fact, while many people complain that Starbucks doesn’t only source fair trade coffee, what they don’t realize is that it costs a coffee plantation a small fortune. That’s money they’d usually rather put elsewhere. There’s also not enough fair trade coffee to supply a company like Starbucks. Starbucks, in turn, pays more than fair trade prices.
And I’ll end my tangent there.
On the original topic, yes, there needs to be an understanding that there are many factors that go into the pricing of wines, but at the same time from a consumer point of view, such a large price difference from other restaurants in the area will cause people to double-take.
December 3rd, 2007 at 6:36 pm
That should read “it costs a coffee plantation a small fortune to become fair trade certified”.
This is what I get for not having my coffee right now ![]()
December 4th, 2007 at 10:37 am
Kudos to Starbucks! Do you think they could get involved in the oil business? Still, I do hate to pay 4 bucks for a cup of joe.
As for wine and the like, they are all luxury items. It seems tacky to whine about the prices (pun intended).
Speaking of wine,I really enjoy Koeppel’s bigger than your head blog, particularly the articles about wine prices going up and Wine Enthusiast’s ideas on the subject. I also found interesting the article on Eric Asimov of the New York Times. Keeps me informed!
December 4th, 2007 at 11:01 am
What about the remainder of the content on each of the highlighted restaurants wine lists? Shouldn’t that be more telling than what they price a commodity such as a branded Champagne? Diners are looking for something unique when they choose a restaurant, that includes the food & the wine. When dining out Downtown I used to see the same wines repeated on every restaurant’s list, including a certain Champagne. Now there is actually some uniqueness throughout. The Majestic Grille’s new wine list is a perfect example of that. It is unique, interesting, adventuresome, full of delicious wines & value-oriented (no matter what you think the price of Clicquot says about it, try looking at the rest of the list). Speaking of value, their “Sunday Suppers” special is $60 for 4 people. That is the epitome of value for the level of food & service you receive. That leaves 4 people plenty of money to spend on a good bottle of wine.
December 4th, 2007 at 12:44 pm
Hmmm…no amount of ambiance or high end decor makes me want to spend near three times the normal retail price for a bottle of anything! I will drop 300.00 on a diner for two but I feel a little insulted when I see that kind of markup on drinks. As far as Veuve Clicquot…I like it but its commonality does not pair as well with a higher markup that should be reserved for rare and more unique offerings.
Just to add fuel to the fire, I’d like to bring up scotch. McEwen’s (which is one of my favorite places to eat) sells Macallan 25 yr. for around $100.00 per pour. Considering the reatil price of the 25 yr. ($500.00+) and the average price ratio of retail to a normal pour of average 12 yr. old scotch, the $100.00 is about right. However, Texas de Brazil sells a flight sampler of Macallan 12, 18 and 25 yr, one oz. pour each, for around $20.00. Scotch sampler anyone?
December 4th, 2007 at 1:32 pm
Olive garden sells Boone’s farm for a fair price.
What a ludicrous post.
Must be nice to have time to worry about the price of champagne when gas is well over $3 a gallon, foreclosures are on the rise and the country is in an endless war with over 3000 young Americans dead and no champagne toasts in sight.
Marie Antoinette would be proud.
December 4th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
Pete, which one of those restaurants do you work at?
James, if you want to debate the points of ecomonics and world politics, there are other blogs.
December 4th, 2007 at 4:19 pm
James,
One might ask why you are wasting your time posting on a food and wine blog when there are such weighty issues of the world that on which you, no doubt, have all the answers.
Viva la capitalism!
December 4th, 2007 at 9:48 pm
Jamie my comrade,
Let me get this straight. Are you saying live and let live? Allow a free, unleashed market AND an impartial press? Allow common citizens to decide on their own where to go, what to buy, what to think, who to vote for? Whaaa?
How outrageous!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think you’re right. I am on the wrong blog. Where are these other political blogs that may have clear thinkers aboard?
Do svidaniya for once and for all!
December 5th, 2007 at 7:40 pm
good riddance to bad rubbish and if you must try to speak/spell in other languages jamie boyo, use spell check in the future. I hope you really are gone and will not respond to this missive. foodies need no clutter as we already are consumed with our passion. also, why does no one mention the great tasting menu on Sunday at JB’s place? 45 smackers for WINE and FOOD is wonderful. Not since Ben’s has it been so good.
December 5th, 2007 at 9:20 pm
Bry Guy: Every week we run a free listing of wine dinners in A la Carte in the CA Food section. All a restaurateur has to do to be included is let me know what’s going on. Send notices to biggs@commercialappeal.com and get them to me by the Friday before the Wednesday publication you want to be in. Include meal, wines, host (if any) price, address, telephone and whether reservations are required. Like I said–it’s free.
December 6th, 2007 at 4:13 pm
I work at a liquor store and know what wine/champagne costs. My wife asks me to not even look at the wine lists at restaurants becasue she knows I will start shaking my head, naming the price of certain bottles and becoming frustrated. I saw one recently where one of my “local favorite” restaurants was charging the same price for “wine by the glass” that it costs to by that bottle at my store. More restaurants should offer customers a choice to bring wine in to help or maybe the fact that some people are stupid enough to pay these prices drives there desire for greed.
December 7th, 2007 at 4:48 pm
Jen Dear, my bemoaning lack of commentary about Circa Sunday tasting menu was simply anguish that other foodies have yet to mention it on this particular string. No one is more keenly aware that I of the commercial appeal printed word, but perhaps you felt the need for a quick plug? No harm in getting the word out! Having followed JB from Park avenue to present location, he does falter on occasion with little details outside the food preparation. PR is not his strong suit it seems. Oh well, it is still a helluva deal on Sunday.
December 7th, 2007 at 6:00 pm
Fred Koeppel has been a food and wine critic for many years and knows his stuff. There is no excuse for that kind of markup on VC. It is unconscionable at best and greedy at worst. Period. I have a very good friend who’s an international wine critic (Robin Garr of wineloverspage.com), and he’s mentioned the markups to me while shaking his head after dining at some fine establishments. It’s a ripoff!
I go to Europe about once a week (business), and over there wine is considered part of a meal and priced accordingly and fairly. There is a small markup (nobody begrudges a restaurateur a profit!), but let’s get real here.
December 7th, 2007 at 7:33 pm
One thing Robin pointed out to me that’s been overlooked in this discussion is the expense involved if a restaurant has to cellar the wine and does it properly. But if it’s just sitting on a shelf … no overhead there except for rent.
December 8th, 2007 at 3:45 am
KKellis………..To cellar wine in a restaurant means to keep it in inventory. Only a handful of places in Memphis have a cellar or a Eurocave to properly keep wine ( I have both ). Champagne does not sell very quickly in Memphis people. We are not a large market. To keep $1,000 in inventory tied up in champagne means a larger mark up for some places because it ties up money that can be spent elsewhere. These are places with larger overhead that try to provide a nicer setting to drink your champgne. So if you want to pay $70 for Yellow label and stare across the street watching bums and frat boys, go ahead. i hope you have insurance on your car.
December 8th, 2007 at 3:49 am
And there is more to overhead than rent. Is that all you pay at your house? No- you have lights, water, staffing, insurance, office supplies,etc. Restaurants are not immune to the cost of business…………in fact, we have more than most.
December 8th, 2007 at 8:45 am
Hey, thanks for the plug, K.K.! You’re the best!
A couple of clarifications, though.
1) Actually, I don’t object to a markup that approximates twice retail. Like it or not, it’s the industry standard. It’s when an eatery goes beyond that point that I get cranky … and Fred’s post does a great job of shining a spotlight on the variations. A wonderful concept. I hope he doesn’t mind if I steal it for Louisville.
2) You’re lucky to have some great, modest eateries in your weekly destination that treat wine as part of a meal. Sadly, though, it’s not as common in Europe as you think. As you know, I travel to Italy and France often on wine-and-food business, and it’s true that those happy Latins - in Italy especially - make it easy to enjoy wine with a meal. But by and large, markups in Northern Europe and the UK - especially at “finer” restaurants - can be as heavy as in the US.
Fred got it right: Compare prices. Be a smart consumer. If you’re really compulsive, memorize the prices of three or four popular wines (Beringer White Zin, Duboeuf Beaujolais, Jadot Bourgogne, Kendall-Jackson Chardonnay), and check them against the wine list when you go out to dine. If they’re marking up unfairly - significantly more than twice what you’d pay at Buster’s … then run away. Or have a beer or an iced tea. Just don’t start thinking about how much money went into making that $1.50 glass of tea …
December 8th, 2007 at 6:48 pm
Chris, excellent replies, and I’m ROFL at your remarks about bums and frat boys and car insurance.
Ain’t DAT da twoof!
I still maintain that your markup is way too pricey, but it sounds like you’re a guy who’s into quality for his customers, and I can appreciate that. A hamburger at Encore is not the same as a hamburger at Krystal.
And you forgot to mention that Memphis is not really a foodie haven; too many chains here and not enough customer support base for you wild and crazy guys who have the guts to try it on your own.
Thanks for the replies. I can see that they were well thought out and truthful, and someday I hope I can try your restaurant.
December 8th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
Wow Chris. Your need to bash a decent midtown restaurant while flaunting your own wares has given me reason to never worry about traveling to that area of Germantown for diner. Appreciate your help.
December 8th, 2007 at 7:40 pm
Robin,
Thanks for jumping into the thread.
About that $1.50 iced tea… You know I’m a tea junkie. Not fair!
Karen
December 8th, 2007 at 8:18 pm
well, let’s say this: The restaurant business is tough, time-consuming, nearly thankless and clearly not intended for the faint-of-heart. As Chris Henderson has pointed out eloquently, it’s also a complicated and expensive business, especially at the (ill-defined) fine-dining level, with a thousand details that need to be dealt with every day. The problem is that when the details are not dealt with, many aspects about the meal, the service and the overall experience suffer. And that’s when patrons decide not to return. But many things are relative. We know that Chris is referring to Umai (bums, frat boys, etc) in his response, but you know, the food at Umai is great, and if that corner on Madison is, um, more picturesque than some people can handle, so be it. I wrote years aso that I would rather be served a great meal by a slattern in a quonset hut than a mediocre meal by a footman in a palace, and I still believe that. (0f course a great meal in a palace is something else.)
Every restaurant owner, manager, chef or whatever has to make the decisions about food and wine prices that fit the type of establishment in question (and balances the expense of running the place), but there are limits; common sense and compassion should play a part in these decisions.
Robin and KK, welcome to the whining and dining blog; thanks for joining in. Robin, thanks for the comments; feel free to use the champagne (or whatever) price comparison. and if you want to take a look at my personal wine blog and website, shoot me an email and I’ll send you the links.
December 8th, 2007 at 11:43 pm
The poke about the location of Umai is pretty tacky coming from someone whose restaurant is back behind Target in a bunch of weeds…
December 9th, 2007 at 4:28 am
Allie…………….I drove the distance to Target after reading your post and it is .76 miles away. Since it is to the west we are in front of Target. There are no weeds because we have a landscape crew that works twice a week. In fact we are in an area of Shelby county that is being developed the most. I tell you what, since I am a gentleman, come out for yourself and take a look at what we are doing. I will treat you…………KK thank you and when you do come to Equestria I will treat you to a bottle of champagne as well, but be forewarned I do not serve VCYL. Fred , never said Umai was bad. I live in Midtown. I have eaten there no less than 6 or 7 times. I do not spend my money at chain restaurants. I have always stayed local and always will. I do not like the location, and I think Ken would have been a little more successful if he chose a different location. That is my opinion and means nothing. If a meal is expensive it is really up to who pays for it. No one forces a guest to select a dish or a wine. I think that every fine dining restaurant in Memphis has it’s hidden gems. Also, as I once told Fredric, there is no true fine dining in Memphis. No one measures up to the standard of service that our parents and grandparents once experienced. I would say that there are only a handful left in the U.S…………and the so called fine dining joints in Mephis are as consistent as the reviews of them in the CA.
December 9th, 2007 at 6:10 pm
FK,
Common sense, compassion,honesty and ethics should be invloved in every decision everyone makes everday at home and the workplace.
Wouldn’t you agree? There are indeed limts in everything.
December 9th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
Speaking of ethics in business, I happen to know that the fine guys at Equestria cooked an enormous amount of turkeys and sides for the poor and underprivileged for Thanksgiving. A round of applause for them. Not mentioning that is unconcionable.
December 10th, 2007 at 12:15 pm
James, well, yes, of course. Not to sound like the Muppets or anything, but if everyone made a resolution to exercise common sense and compassion, honesty and a sense of ethics (not only in the restaurant business), the world would be a very different place.
Pete, i agree that the fine guys at Equestria should be applauded for feeding the poor and underprivileged on Thanksgiving, but that act, however newsworthy, has nothing to do with a review of the restaurant.
And I’m interested in Chris Henderson’s comment that “there is no true fine dining in Memphis” and that there are only a handful of fine dining restaurants left in the U.S., interested enough that I think I’ll create a new post to explore that notion. Thanks.
December 10th, 2007 at 2:11 pm
Fredric,
Interesting. Finally, something we can agree upon. Honesty,a sense of ethics,decency, and fairness in all business, the restaurant business or journalism. Looking at the whole picture and representing it accurately is the right thing to do.
There is enough strife in the world and to allow it to permeate a food and wine blog just doesn’t seem in the spirit of Christmas–or whatever you may celebrate.
Merry Christmas.
December 11th, 2007 at 9:42 pm
While I’ve never been a frat boy, and I’m currently gainfully employed, I’ll be happy to raise a glass of my $2 Newcastle to anyone enjoying their $70 Veuve Clicquot across the street.
Then I’ll break into your car, apparently.
December 12th, 2007 at 12:23 am
Ha! Randal, that’s priceless! Thanks …..
& James, Merry Christmas to you too, and good or great or fine dining wherever you are.



47 comment.